CM Files
S6K Home   Audio   Video   People   Contact

Coming Soon
Stay Tuned...

feature link above

site directory below

WBAI 99.5 fm NYC
Pacifica Radio
Official Media
Sponsor of
s6k / Real University

Madama Griffitts LLP
Official Legal Council
for s6k

Worker Education
Resource Library

s6k Arts



Real University
About RU

Real University News

The Claims of the Negro (our Black history link library)

Impact Unit
Educational CD Distribution Program

Impact Unit
Community Outreach

Info Unit

Monition E-Zine


Betraying Another Green Champion
The Sierra Club's Inexplicable Treatment
of Cynthia McKinney

Weekend Edition July 13, 2004

The Georgia state chapter of the Sierra Club, in coordination with the
Atlanta Metro Group of the Sierra Club, have failed to endorse former
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, a long time champion of Sierra Club
causes, in her bid to win back the 4th Congressional District of Georgia's congressional seat, as their primary candidate of choice in the Democratic primary next Tuesday. (The winner of the primary is the hands down favorite to get the seat.) Club officials instead did not officially endorse any of the three out of the five Democratic candidates they consider "environmentally friendly." Besides McKinney, the Sierra Club identified Cathy Woolard, current City Council Chair of the Atlanta City Council, and African American state Senator Nadine Thomas. However, they did offer a lesser level of support, known as "support short of condition" for Thomas and Woolard, which allows them access to Club mailing lists and other less visible means of support, while ignoring McKinney.

A look at the publicly professed environmental positions of the three
candidates does not support this action. While Woolard shows an
informed, detailed and progressive position paper toward the environment, one worthy of mention and support, Thomas' positions are
lackluster, localized, and even questionable. In fact, Thomas lists
what she calls her top three priorities on the environment if she gets
into congress. Those are, according to her website:

(1) working to provide funding for implementation of an extensive rapid
rail transit system in Georgia;

(2) working to provide funding for more green space and the creation of
a network of bicycle and walking paths; and

(3) working to create a tax credit for companies that meet specific
standards when it comes to protecting and improving the environment in
their business practices.

As you can see, these show a very narrow view of the nation's
environmental problems. While rapid rail transit systems are important,
as are green space and bike and walking paths, they do not address head on some of our nation's most pressing problems. In addition, giving
corporations tax credits for doing the right thing on the environment
is questionable. Thomas also broadly calls for "public-private
partnerships" in working toward protecting the environment, a concept
that can sometimes lead to big problems for citizens concerned in
environmental protection, depending on the details.

This failure to endorse McKinney can only be seen as a betrayal of the
greatest kind. When McKinney was in Congress, she worked tirelessly for
issues which the Sierra Club supports. Several examples of how McKinney benefitted the Sierra Club can easily be found by some basic internet searches. For example, Mother Jones magazine called McKinney's introduction of the National Forest Protection Act in the House of Representatives as a "minor miracle." In fact, the Sierra Club and
McKinney's name appeared in publications numerous times together in
regard to this legislation's introduction, and the Sierra Club used it
at a time when the forest protection movement had been battered by the
salvage rider, which McKinney opposed, as an shining example of the
positive efforts that were being made on behalf of public forests. In
addition, the Sierra Club and McKinney worked together on other issues,
such as proportional representation and civil rights for environmental
activists. Where is the record of this kind of commitment from the
other candidates?

The Sierra Club owes the environmental movement an explanation, and a
better one than they have provided up to this point. If the environment
is suffering because some Sierra Club officials have not made an
endorsement decision based upon the facts, that is a disservice to the
entire movement. Ms. McKinney has been too loyal to not just the
environmental movement, but to progressive causes across the board, to
be treated like this. What the Sierra Club's action may be contributing
too is another situation where a well funded, less progressive female
African American candidate is being set up to receive another large
crossover Republican vote in the primary, combined with the environmentally aware white candidate, both ready to peel off some of
the white progressive vote, will defeat McKinney again. It is no secret
that McKinney has significant support in the African American community, and another such outcome would not go down well with this community.

At a time when the way-too-white environmental movement has a
opportunity to build a bridge deep into the African American community,
an alliance that any thinking, white, environmentalist knows is long
overdue and needed, this action by the Sierra Club is a step in the wrong direction - a bad misstep in the wrong direction. It should be corrected and corrected now. In the long run, this kind of lack of loyalty and lack of appreciation of a long time ally will only hurt the Sierra Club worse than anyone else. But it is hurting us all some, and the Club needs to explain why it is doing this.

Mark Donham, a longtime environmental organizer, lives in Brookport,
Illlinois. He can be reached at:

S6K Home   Audio   Video   People   Contact



Page design by Deftly-D for Voidstar Productions and Sektor 6 Kommunikations. Vision and content provided by Darryl Hell for Sektor 6 Kommunikations.